Article: Wilson, D. (2011). Brutally Unfair Tactics Totally OK Now.

Game Studies LogoTitle: Brutally Unfair Tactics Totally OK Now: On Self-Effacing Games and Unachievements.
Author: Douglas Wilson
Year: 2011
Additional: Game Studies 11 (1)
Available at:

In this paper, I use a party game that I co-designed, Brutally Unfair Tactics Totally OK Now (B.U.T.T.O.N.), as a case study to suggest some alternative possibilities for the design of digitally-mediated play and games. Specifically, I argue that that intentionally “broken” or otherwise incomplete game systems can help nurture a distinctly self-motivated and collaborative form of play. I propose two terms: “unachievements” and “self-effacing games,” which help articulate the specific qualities that distinguish broken games like B.U.T.T.O.N. from more traditional digital games. In addition, I situate these games in terms of Henning Eichberg’s concept of the “impossible game” and Bernie DeKoven’s notion of the “Well-Played game.” In drawing our attention not just to players, but also to the relationships between them, Eichberg and DeKoven offer us provocative clues on what it might mean to design for togetherness.

Two Introductory Anecdotes
Outline & Method
Playing B.U.T.T.O.N.
Situating B.U.T.T.O.N.
Achievements, Anti-Achievements, Unachievements
Self-Effacing Games
Impossible Games and Festivity
The Well-Played Poorly-Player Game

This entry was posted in Article and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.